Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 4221 - 4240 of 4,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2008, 6:01 am
Rice 38 Army 31 Note to the Owls (7-3/5-1 C-USA) -- unlike some other teams, Army (3-7) does not quit when they are behind by 24 points. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:59 pm
Tucson police started using the 8000 model Dec. 1, 2006. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
Our best guess, which as before could be way off the mark, is that implied preemption will be recognized as viable in the prescription drug context in Levine, but that the preemption ruling will be narrowly crafted to the case's drug-specific facts - specifically, that: (1) the FDA had already considered the risk in question, gangrene from Phenergan administered by "IV Push," and (2) the FDA approved the drug's labeling with all the relevant information about this risk… [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:33 pm
[1] Mansfield Tanick & Cohen P.A.: Will Your Non-Compete Agreement Stand Up in Court? [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
  This distinction is key because the RIAA does not obtain evidence of actual downloading of the songs found in shared folders. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
  In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944  it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:20 am
McCain by 1 point Wildcard John Kennedy (R) beats Mary Landrieu (D) in Louisiana [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:21 pm
Interestingly IRS Publication 1779, which is only two pages does not specifically mention the 20 factor test set forth in IRS Revenue Ruling 87-41, 1987-1 C.B. 296. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:30 pm
The financial situation is also a factor but in the final analysis McConnell should win.So, how does this all add up. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:42 pm
  Of the Global 100 firms with offices in at least three countries, a few numbers: Firm (overall ranking)                         % of lawyers outside home country Kirkland & Ellis (11)                    … [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:00 pm
The reduction to $36 per hour became effective January 1, 2008. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Wilson & Co., 547 F.2d 367, 370 (7th Cir. 1976) ("[T]he statute does not provide a cause of action for private parties suing for civil damages. [read post]