Search for: "Ex Parte Mays" Results 4221 - 4240 of 12,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
P. 8(d)(3) (“party may state as many separate claims or defenses as it has, regardless of consistency”)), and the Board has consistently recognized a party’s right to plead in the alternative.Moreover, the Board observed, Applicant Lee’s counterclaim "is fundamentally flawed because it necessarily assumes that Opposer’s legal arguments in the ex parte proceeding were false, material and relied upon by the Board in rendering its decision… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated v Brownlie, heard 9-10 May 2017. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 7:45 pm
There are multiple occasions when spousal support can legally end before the ex-spouse’s passing, and if you or your spouse may be in one of these situations, it can save you time and money in the future. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 3:44 am by Howard Iken
Vogel successfully found a way to restore the parental rights of a mother wishing desperately to be part of her child’s life. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:28 pm by Staff Writer
  One part of the conspiracy statute deals with defrauding the U.S. government. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:15 am by Matthew Kahn
The expedited time-frame may indicate that the administration’s concerns over backlash in the Arab world are diminishing. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:00 am by Sarah Grant
Second, the laptops may have been, or could be, altered in such a way as to allow wireless internet access. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The YouTube star Chrissy Chambers successfully sued her ex-boyfriend under this law in the High Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:43 am by Wail Sarieh
” You may be familiar with the state’s “ten-year rule,” which awards “permanent” spousal support, in some cases, to ex-spouses who were married for a decade or more. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Here it is: You and [nephew] keep all that I have house and superannuation, put my ashes in the back garden … [wife] will take her stuff only she’s ok gone back to her ex AGAIN I’m beaten. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
  As is often the case, the answer is 2-edged kind of thing; on the one hand, reducing the pressure on taxpayers may provide more time, and hence more opportunities, to provide urgent valuable service to panicked clients – i.e., more time to figure out ways to stop collection; on the other hand, less IRS collection harassment will cause a lot of burdened taxpayers less incentive to reach out for professional help – e.g., retain an attorney, E.A., or other tax professional. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:10 am by Michael Risch
This fear may or may not be well grounded, but if this is the perception, it will certainly drive policy. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:10 am by Michael Risch
This fear may or may not be well grounded, but if this is the perception, it will certainly drive policy. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 2:41 pm by Chuck Cosson
  And affairs are fueled, in part, by secrecy and a sense of entitlement. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 10:02 am by Garrett Hinck
President Donald Trump is expected to announce today that he will continue to waive sanctions on Iran as part of the 2015 nuclear deal, the New York Times reported. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Part of the problem is knowing how to sift through reams of information. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:45 am by Eric Caligiuri
 There other, offered by Ericcson, is an “ex ante,” or ex-Standard, approach which seeks to measure in absolute terms the value which Ericsson’s patents add to a product. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Gustavo Arballo
Baste con decir que solo 6 de los 23 Estados Partes de la Convención y 8 de los 34 Estados Miembros de la OEA incluyen en sus legislaciones al matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  Compare, for example, the nonappealability statute for ex parte reexamination, which provides that “[a] determination by the Director . . . that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised will be final and nonappealable. [read post]