Search for: "Express Services Inc" Results 4221 - 4240 of 6,134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
.“ He also mentioned the Tamiz v Google Inc case [2012] EWHC 449 (QB), in which Eady J declined jurisdiction in the proceedings and set aside the order for service out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
BROCK SPECIALTY SERVICES, LTD., et al., Appellees. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Striking of pleadings -- Error to enter order striking pleadings as sanction for refusal of plaintiff and her attorney to appear where written order does not make it apparent that court considered all factors set out in Kozel v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:33 am by Alan Horowitz
The basic tax dispute revolved around the continuing vitality of the Court’s 1958 decision in The Colony, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:36 am by Geoff Cockrell
Great Expressions has, over the past four years, strategically grown by integrating 98 offices through 11 acquisitions, helping land the firm on Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:38 pm
In this case, Roxrun Estates, Inc. et al, are the respondents-appellants, and the Roxbury Run Village Association, Inc et al., is the other appellant-respondent and defendants. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Derrick Hibbard
Witt and Associates, Inc., a design company, entered into various contracts with La Gorce Country Club, Inc. for hydrogeologic consulting services and overall project coordination relative to the design and construction of a reverse osmosis water treatment system. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Estes Express Lines, Inc., 631 F.3d 1010, 1017 (9th Cir. 2011), the Ninth Circuit held that “CAFA’s language unambiguously directs the district court to look only to the complaint in deciding whether the criteria set forth in § 1332(d)(4)(A)(i)(II)(aa) and (bb) are satisfied. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm by WIMS
"       Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and other Republican Committee member expressed concern about the rule. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Cases involving four journalists and seven others have been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Justice Sotomayor again diverged from the majority, handing down a dissenting opinion which focused on the broad meaning which should be ascribed to “actual damages”, an expression she felt could not be limited to pecuniary injuries only. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:15 am by Mandelman
  I’d like your opinion on the following purely hypothetical scenario…   If a small group of individuals working within a nation’s government made a series of decisions that destroyed the economic security of tens of millions of the country’s citizens… decisions that literally cost thousands of lives, and in all likelihood shortened the life expectancies of hundreds of thousands more… failed to such a degree that it would be more than a decade before… [read post]