Search for: "F. v. R." Results 4221 - 4240 of 20,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
., 2017) See King’s Discharging Taxes in Consumer Bankruptcy Cases, at ¶ 3.11(f)(4), ¶ 3.13. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Ronald Mann
[I]f you’re not challenging their decision not to institute review, why would that make any difference? [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:36 pm
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 77, no. 3, 2017) is out. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:55 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Der Betrug funktioniert wie folgt: «Meine Sendungen»-Betrug: Schritt für Schritt Für «Meine Sendungen» benötigt man Zugriff auf ein Nutzerkonto für die Onlinedienste der Schweizerischen Post («Post Login»). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:00 pm by EEM
," Forced Migration Review, no. 56 (Oct. 2017) [open access]"The Double Edged Sword of Discretion in LGBT Refugee Cases in the UK," Rights in Exile Newsletter, no. 86 (Nov. 2017) [full-text]EU Fails to Identify and Protect Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender Asylum Seekers (IRIN, Nov. 2017) [text]"A Framework for Clinical Practice with Sexual and Gender Minority Asylum Seekers," Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, Online First, 5 Oct. 2017 [ResearchGate]"No… [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 7:01 pm
Grosse Aufmerksamkeit wird zudem der Frage gewidmet, wie sich das WTO-Recht im System des internationalen Wirtschaftsrechts für die Zukunft positioniert. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
AOL the key decision on Section 230 immunity https://t.co/SWfcCBaTZf 2017-11-19 US court thumbs its nose at Supreme Court of Canada: Google v Equustek https://t.co/JQyDGCljeL 2017-11-19 There is no internet freedom without responsibility https://t.co/WM631G9lw5 2017-11-19 "The Commercial Usenet Stinks on All Sides," Anti-Piracy Boss Says – TorrentFreak https://t.co/XZ43GSFo6S 2017-11-19 California Court to Supreme Court of Canada: F*** You (paraphrasing) | Allen… [read post]
Even so, the Court went on, in obiter, to declare that the well-known test in R v Ghosh [1982] EWCA Crim 2 should no longer represent the law. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am by DARRYL HUTCHEON, MATRIX
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]