Search for: "FRANKS v. STATE"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2009, 1:10 pm
[As stated by State v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:02 pm
The breakthrough last year came with Witt v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:04 am
State analysis. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:41 am
And last week, in State v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:00 am
The only way to ensure that this does not occur is to preempt the state law standard for setting compensation. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:55 pm
Confirmed: Unanimously Most Recent Opinion: Illinois Investment Trust v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:33 am
The case was Hamm v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:57 pm
That's the last time the state of Texas impeached a sitting judge, and according to Burnam, Rep. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:01 pm
No, WDNY Judge Larimer, holds in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:50 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 6:36 pm
Barney Frank (D - Mass). [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Abdualdabat and State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:21 pm
Representative Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., and Senator Edward Kennedy, D-Mass. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
The defendants in US v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:24 am
V. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:20 am
Franks, Water, Theology, and the New Mexico Water Code, 48 Natural Resources Journal 227-244 (2008).Mark Strasser, State Funding of Devotional Studies: A Failed Jurisprudence That Has Lost Its Moorings, 11 Journal of Law & Family Studies 1-34 (2008).Kelly S. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:41 am
Frank Pallone, Jr. [read post]
