Search for: "Fall v. State Bar"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
California and Arkansas, for example, bar hikes in the wake of a declaration of an emergency that exceed a certain percentage-point increase over the pre-emergency price level.[11] Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Connecticut bar any price increase beyond that required by the higher costs of post-disaster economic activity.[12] While these standards may not initially appeal to merchants in that they restrict prices, the… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
Donovan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 am
You’re not going to show up in the law library (which we don’t even have anymore) and fall in love with Matthew McConaughey’s double in our Main Street law office. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:14 pm
THE PROBLEM: Capacity v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
The case, known as Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
In 2007, many of the restrictions had been struck down by a federal judge in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
This alleged scheme came in a case called Jones v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
Supreme Court held in Twombly v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Social distancing required at restaurantsThe 50-person limit does not apply to restaurants and bars. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:29 am
Skinner v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 7:27 am
The Justice Department challenged these and other restrictions under the NVRA and the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s Materiality Provision, which bars states from rejecting voter registrations based on inconsequential omissions that do not call into question a voter’s qualifications. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Do I believe these dominoes will fall? [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Do I believe these dominoes will fall? [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Assn. v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Clear coverage: Transunion v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:08 am
As for whether the predicate “invasion … against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government” has been met, Judge Boasberg put forward a framework for how he would consider the question on the merits, pointing to prior cases like Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
Ct. 2729 (2011), likewise struck down a law barring sales of violent video games to minors and requiring an “18” label. [read post]
