Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 4221 - 4240 of 37,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2010, 7:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Martinez (state university funding of religious group). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The article identifies 8 attributes of quack corporate governance regulation: (1) The new law is a bubble act, enacted in response to a major negative economic event. (2) It is enacted in a crisis environment. (3) It is a response to a populist backlash against corporations and/or markets. (4) It is adopted at the federal rather than state level. (5) It transfers power from the states to the federal government. (6) Interest groups that are strong at the federal level but… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:52 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
One group argues that churches have inherent autonomy, and a corresponding jurisdictional independence of the state, vis-à-vis matters within the church’s domain. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:34 am by Steven M. Gursten
Teaching law students at Wayne State University Law School trial class On Wednesday, I will have the pleasure of teaching a group of very bright law school students during Michigan Court of Appeals Judge Elizabeth Gleicher’s advanced trial class at Wayne State University Law School. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:25 am by Amy Howe
”  In the Boston Review, Pam Karlan explains why the Court’s recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
It does so when the social meaning of the action demeans anyone or any group. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by csc4
A bipartisan group of Ohio state senators introduced legislation that would forbid police from issuing speeding tickets based solely on the officer's estimation. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Judgment Warby J cited the relevant principles on meaning from paras 11 to 12 of Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB). [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]