Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 8:00 pm
A “Joint Commission” consisting of eight members--US, UK, France, Germany, China, Russia, Iran and the EU--will be created to monitor implementation and resolve disputes. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
In a published statement about the deployment, Germany’s Foreign Office stated, “Germany’s presence in the South China Sea underscores its continued commitment to freedom of navigation and the preservation of the rules-based international order in the Indo-Pacific, which is coming under pressure in the South China Sea. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:01 am
The Israeli Supreme Court recently rejected a challenge to Israel’s version of this system, in a case called Adalah v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
While much attention had been paid to the decoupling between the United States and China, as each consolidated their own self-conceptions of empire and began to stake out (abstract and physical) territories, substantially little attention has been paid to a similar process that is developing between China and the European Union. [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
Müller examined 59 megalithic sites in France (Brittany), Ireland, Scotland and northern Germany in order to determine which stellar (star) risings and settings were used for astronomical orientation in those days. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Mich. 1987) ............................................................ 46 Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am
Germany – On 31 December 2020, BaFin published a limited national relief measure in the insurance sector. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am
In contrast, a competing French firm operating in Germany would only face the German tax rate of 30 percent on its German income. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am
Narroschke was confidential.This submission was filed after the debate on the matter had been closed and a decision had been taken during the Oral Proceedings and has therefore not been taken into account.Relying on a number of portions of the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO (hereinafter: the "Guidelines"), Part C, Chapter V, the appellants refer to the fact that, further to the communication according to Rule 71(3) EPC, they had requested grant of a patent based on a higher… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:13 pm
Session 2: The Menu of Options for Design Protection: Where Does/Should Trademark and Unfair Competition Law Fit? [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
At least in Germany, the largest European market, there is no eBay v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
Google, or who debated the Blizzard v. bnetd DMCA case with me back in the day. [read post]
Italy's Constitutional Referendum: A View From Italy in Conversation With Flora and Alessandro Sapio
3 Dec 2016, 7:43 pm
Sono altresì oggetto di modifica la disciplina del cd. regionalismo differenziato e del potere sostitutivo dello Stato nei confronti degli enti territoriali.La revisione del titolo V non trova applicazione nei confronti delle Regioni a statuto speciale e delle Province autonome sino alla revisione dei rispettivi statuti, sulla base di intese con gli enti interessati.La riforma prevede altresì la soppressione del CNEL. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am
Baker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm
Backed by U.S. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm
The Justice Department’s pursuit of criminal charges against the perpetrators of the Jan. 6 mob invasion of the Capitol is gathering steam, and in late March, the former leading federal prosecutor in the complex investigation made a surprise appearance on “60 Minutes. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:45 am
New case: Lewis v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
