Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 44,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 6:31 am
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:54 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In the first part, published yesterday, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 2:24 pm
In Appalachian Power Co. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Planned Parenthood, and Justice Thomas opinion focusing on abortion as eugenics; Supreme Court's granting of certiorari on Louisiana's abortion law; increasingly restrictive enactments by various states; and challenges to new HHS health care conscience rules.Supreme Court's decision in American Legion v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:00 pm
Anyone looking for good cert vehicles to give to their favorite SCOTUS litigator this holiday season ought to be sure to check out a new opinion from the Seventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
As long as I am on the topic of the Federalists, I might as well repeat a question to Rick Garnett that I asked him on our panel at the Federalist Society - to whit, why don't good Federalist Society members support the Court's decisions in Grutter, Kelo, and Locke v Davey? [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:35 pm
The Hon’ble Single Judge of the Delhi High Court relied primarily on two decisions with regard to comparative advertising - De Beers Abrasive v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
" NLRB v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire & Cas. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:53 pm
Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 11:00 am
In Tolbert v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Kubiak v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
I’m not familiar with this state law claim, but the magistrate apparently breaks new ground here. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
A consumer searching for e-cigarettes, when faced with a mark with a reputation for clothing and jewellery, will not make the required link necessary to succeed under Article 8(5) EUTMR because the goods are completely different.The decisionEarlier trade marks with a reputation in a Member State enjoy extended protection in accordance with Article 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:29 am
(See also Whren v. [read post]
