Search for: "Heard v. State" Results 4221 - 4240 of 17,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
However, it was not stated whether journalists will have the right to argue against the disclosure of phone records. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:55 am by Donna Eng
By now, most everyone out there has heard of the scandal surrounding Penn State’s Joe Paterno and the former defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 29/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong,… [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 19 July to 221 July 2023 the trial in the case of Ijaz v Manan was heard by Linden J. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:45 am by Jocelyn Hutton
From Monday 9th May – Tuesday 10th May, the Court will assess costs in Secretary of State for Health and others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 44. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:58 am by Howard Knopf
In a very unusual development in a case that promised to be very interesting and important both domestically and internationally, Apotex has filed a notice of discontinuance literally on the day before and figuratively on the steps into the Court in its appeal against Sanofi in the Supreme Court of Canada that was to have been heard earlier today in Apotex et al v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:35 am by Marty Lederman
Pennsylvania, a case the court heard in February concerning whether a state judge should have recused himself from a capital case in which he had an earlier involvement. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:11 pm by Rick Hasen
The en banc appeals court heard arguments in the case, known as MCFL v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:46 pm
Earlier this fall, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument in Tanner v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:54 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
Ms Rose suggested that the majority of the Court appear to have based their decision on the interpretation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, on which no argument was heard. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am by Laura Sandwell
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 26 – 27 November 2013. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:02 am by Cheryl Cheatham
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (11-393), United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 21 Feb 2017. [read post]