Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 4221 - 4240 of 4,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 122 F.3d 1409, 1415 (Fed. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:10 am
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decided last year in Holder v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:57 am
Zeneca and ICI agreed to: (1) pay Barr $21 million; (2) pay Barr’s supplier $35.9 million; and (3) supply Barr with Zeneca-manufactured tamoxifen for resale in the United States at a high royalty rate. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
May 16, 2007)at the 9th Circuit WebsiteThe opinion is also available online at Stanford Cyberlawand at LawGeek (Jason Schulz)The copyright infringement case discussed in this posting and just decided in the 9th Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals really has it all. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:37 pm
Three weeks ago, in No. 05-1345, United Haulers Association v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:10 pm
That rule, named for decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a case called In re Fobian, 951 F.2d 1149 (9th Cir. 1991), had barred unsecured creditors from recovering as part of their unsecured claim attorney's fees incurred post-petition litigating bankruptcy issues. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:51 pm
Period of admission: A Y-1 worker can be admitted for a two year period that can be renewed twice if that worker spends a period of one year outside the United States between each admission. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 2:53 pm
  The machine was patented in the United States, and the patent holder sued, alleging infringement. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
United States, 914 A.2d 1 (D.C. 2006) (discussed here), which analyzes  blank">Crawford v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:13 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeSentencing Minutes Satisfied 'Categorical Approach' In Deciding Prior 'Violent Felony' for ACCA Purposes United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
On the contrary, she prevailed against the plaintiffs' claims.April 23, 2007, Decision and Order Denying RIAA Reconsideration Motion*For those of you interested in reading more from the United States Supreme Court's decision in Fogerty v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 7:27 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]