Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 6,702
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 5:14 pm
In a California family law case, Dawn D. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:08 am
The plaintiffs in both cases challenge the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA, which defines “marriage”, in federal law, to mean “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” In both cases, Judge Joseph Tauro held that the statute was indeed unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:46 pm
In the case of U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
In subsequent federal litigation between the ex-wife and the estate of the ex-husband, was this waiver enforced? [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:13 am
As Dubiel v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
Simpkins v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
An interesting twist to the engagement ring story occurred in the case of Randall v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
In the case of Mudafort v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
KALTENBACHER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
The board suffered through years of abuse from a husband and wife. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
Boggs v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
The case of Williams v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Jeremy Clarkson denied a claim by his ex-wife Alexandra Hall that he had an affair with Ms Hall after he re-married. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
Section 3 defines the term “marriage” for purposes of federal law as being between a man and a woman, and it defines the term “spouse” as a husband or wife of the opposite sex. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
The husband’s estate claimed a right to the plan proceeds, citing the ex-wife’s waiver. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:28 am
At the time of the parties' divorce, the former wife was largely unemployed for 18 years and the former husband earned more than $1 million per year. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:20 am
By Nicole KilloranMolleur v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:34 pm
However, the ex-husband failed to remove his ex-wife as the designated beneficiary of his 401(k) plan. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
