Search for: "M v. M"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 53,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 4:40 pm
I'm kinda agreeing with you on that one, Justice Ramirez. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:21 am
I'm not sure why I've seen a rise in the number of cases in which the sentence seems unduly lenient. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:18 am
I'm in the Canadian wilderness on vacation, but it's a testament to our interconnected world that there is still sporadic Internet access. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 3:40 pm
Even if you're using an escrow service or whatever, the ways that you can get scammed out of your money are essentially infinite.Otherwise, as here, your money may well end up in Russia.I'm actually stunned they ended up catching any of the people here. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:50 am
Sort of.Still, I'm no Raiders fan. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:54 pm
I'm not at all sure why the plaintiff even thinks it's worth the money to litigate this one.But Judge Bress nonetheless thinks that the intervening Supreme Court opinion requires that the district court take another look at this one, notwithstanding the panel's original affirmance, and presents a darn good argument for that result.Regardless, it's a good exegesis on how intervening and circuit precedent properly interact. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 2:32 pm
"Well, I'm not exactly sure that it's an entirely cautionary tale, since the Ninth Circuit affirms the decision below notwithstanding the judge's (alleged) Twitter account and "forwarded" tweets about the case he was in the midst of adjudicating. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
For example, personally I'm a fan of warrants before the police invade a home.But there's a ton of precedent that makes it clear that you don't have standing to challenge a search when you're not permitted to be there. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:24 pm
" Plus the newspaper has a mug shot and more details about the defendant.I'm not saying anything normative here. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
"On the one hand, the crimes are (to me, at least) horrific home invasions -- plus the attempted murder of police officers while evading arrest -- and I'm more than happy for the perpetrators to be incarcerated for a relatively lengthy period of time.On the other hand, the defendant here was simply the getaway driver, and she has already served more than 14 years in prison.Whatchathink? [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:30 pm
I think you know what I'm talking about.Yep. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:22 pm
I'm a reasonably intelligent guy. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:04 pm
But I'm not certain that the guy is forever irredeemable.But he gets 50 years in prison. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:46 pm
I'm not going to recite all the facts of this rape conviction, since they're (1) long, and (2) brutal. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:54 am
I'm the ex-Army guy that tends to post about professionalism and teaching but I hope to branch out a little more this month. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 12:13 pm
I'm admittedly unsophisticated when it comes to the criminal possession of handguns by felons. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
I'm glad that Wife is now out of that (acutely) horrible situation.Just one minor error: Given the context, at the top of page 3, in the sentences that say "At a March 15, 2023 hearing, Husband was represented by counsel. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:12 pm
Which they discover after handcuffing the dude and pulling the thing out.Not what the police were expecting, I'm sure.Unfortunately for Mr. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:23 am
For example, I'm not going to recite the facts that ultimately resulted in a case over which the California Supreme Court ultimately granted review. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
Because I can virtually promise you that, on remand, the trial court will find him ineligible for Prop. 36 relief on the ground that his release would pose an unreasonable risk to public safety.Which is what'll happen when you're convicted of (1) smuggling methamphetamine into prison, and (2) attempted murder while serving a life sentence.Now, I could perhaps be wrong.But I bet I'm not. [read post]
