Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 20,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2022, 8:34 am
The Court concluded that the district court erred in considering the zone-of-interests test a question of subject matter jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court has made clear that it is a merits issue. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 10:01 pm
He explores the importance of framing, why losing something hurts twice as much as gaining the same thing, and many other matters that may help you persuade your audiences more effectively. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 8:13 am
Clause (1)(B)(i) is most relevant for software patents: (b) ELIGIBILITY EXCLUSIONS. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
The courts haven’t yet come up with a firm answer, sorry to say.) b. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:21 pm
No matter what requirements the government placed on U.S. companies, sophisticated criminals could still get strong encryption from non-U.S. sources that aren’t subject to that type of regulation. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:59 am
Case C 147/14 Loutfi Management Propriété intellectuelle SARL v AMJ Meatproducts NV, Halalsupply NV is a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling last Thursday in a Community trade mark-related reference from Belgium. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 1:27 pm
This is true no matter when they were approved. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:14 am
Because the Delaware corporate statute allows rights to be set by way of a formula, the charter’s means of assigning rights to signatories to a stockholder’s agreement was permissible, and it didn’t matter that the rights were based on the identity of the stockholders instead of the class of stock (Colon v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:36 am
Hague Convention, art. 13(b). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
Thus, familiarity7.b) with the FSTP-Test8) pays. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:27 am
Dukes into the fold for 216(b) collective actions by using Rule 23’s commonality standard to drive the certification decision. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:18 am
Because the Vought memorandum only addresses funds that are “appropriated to the Executive Branch,” it has no effect on Section 502(b) funds. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 2:32 am
The exact meaning of this clause is some obscure and the Recitals don't really assist. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 7:00 am
"(B) Neck cancer of any type. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
§ 1144(b)(2)(A). http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/29/18/I/B/5/1144 The medical claims at issue were for treatment received during the extension period mandated by both insurance laws. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
However, the Court was quick to confirm that the district court did not err as a matter of law by engaging in that approach. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:07 am
According to the Applicant:[T]he cited sections of Fischer merely describe actuators 4 enclosed within a vibration damper module 1. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am
However, in this decision, the CJEU commented for the first time on the requirement of distinctiveness under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR in relation to sound marks. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
"Explaining that the Supreme Court erred in concluding that the privacy exemption under Public Officers Law §87(2)(b) creates a blanket exemption allowing the custodian to withhold the disciplinary records of unsubstantiated allegations and did not articulate any particularized and specific justification for withholding any of the records, the Police Department "did not meet [it's] burden of establishing that the privacy exemption applies. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
"Explaining that the Supreme Court erred in concluding that the privacy exemption under Public Officers Law §87(2)(b) creates a blanket exemption allowing the custodian to withhold the disciplinary records of unsubstantiated allegations and did not articulate any particularized and specific justification for withholding any of the records, the Police Department "did not meet [it's] burden of establishing that the privacy exemption applies. [read post]
