Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 4221 - 4240 of 22,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2022, 10:33 am by John Jascob
“If there were to be a mandated rule on the timing of disclosure of a cyber incident for public companies, then both as an authority matter and as a policy matter, the SEC had better be careful about not doing more harm than good,” said White.White thinks any rules would take time and might not be able to be completed in 2022.In Hinman’s view, cybersecurity rules are on the “short term agenda” and Gensler will take this on in… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This matter cries out for an immediate revision of the access rules to criminal history information based upon the spirit, rather than the letter of the rule. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by Jeff Vail
 (Note that Sonitrol was decided before Iqbal, in which the Supreme Court expressly extended the Twombly standard to all federal complaints, not just antitrust matters).Ultimately, Sonitrol neither adopted nor rejected Twombly. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:31 pm by Orin Kerr
But I wonder if it might matter if the Court adopts a plain error test, depending on what kind of plain error test the Court adopts. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The transmittal of a draft of a preliminary opinion that was never adopted, signed or sent to all counsel is not a binding ruling. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
While most administrative disciplinary actions involving public sector employees are presently processed in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in a collective bargaining agreement, in some instances other laws, rules and regulations will control. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:06 pm
  While many of the laws and regulations are based on the same set of model rules, no two states seem to take the same interpretation with regard to the rules. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm by Florian Mueller
One ruling was scheduled for today but postponed to December 30, 2013. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:39 pm
ROLE OF WTO APPELLATE BODY RULINGS IN THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:28 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  If the rule does not explicitly restrict protected activities, it will only violate Section 8(a)(1) upon a showing that: (1) employees would reasonably construe the language to prohibit Section 7 activity; (2) the rule was promulgated in response to union activity; or (3) the rule has been applied to restrict the exercise of Section 7 rights. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 2:45 pm
Furthermore, we understand that few things in life are as emotionally taxing as a legal issue involving your children, which is why we dedicate ourselves to doing whatever we can to help you resolve your legal matter successfully. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 12:58 pm
New Mexico recently adopted a disclosure requirement. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Finally, the Final Rule provides several examples of how the Department’s joint employer guidance should be applied in various factual circumstances Final Rule Modifications To Existing Rules On Joint Employment in Scenario One Situations Under the Final Rule in a Scenario One situation under which an employee performs work for the employer that simultaneously benefits another individual or entity, the Final Rule adopts a four-factor… [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
We base our declination on two primary considerations: the Court’s recent emphatic rejection of attempts to name previously unrecognized categories, and the oft-repeated reluctance of the Supreme Court to adopt broad rules dealing with state regulations protecting individual privacy as they relate to free speech. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:32 pm by Michael Atkins
Third, because member groups may freely adopt and adapt TFN’s listed rules of etiquette and because of the voluntary and amorphous nature of these rules, they cannot be considered an actual control. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:15 am by Cecile Martin
The Supreme Court ruled that the scope of the Code of conduct was too broad in that employees may report any breach of the Code relating to finance, accounting and anti- corruption areas but also any breach in others matters to the extent that it could threaten the vital interests of Dassault or the physical or moral integrity of an individual employee (intellectual property rights, confidentiality, conflict of interest, discrimination, sexual or psychological harassment). [read post]