Search for: "Michael Moment" Results 4221 - 4240 of 4,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 9:37 pm by Jim Sedor
The search was the latest discomfiting moment for a president who has sought to contrast his sensitivity to rule-following with that of Donald Trump, who faces a criminal investigation into his handling of classified documents. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Washington Post – Sean Sullivan, Michael Scherer, and David Weigel | Published: 3/30/2020 Behind the growing fear among many Democrats that U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Throughout 2016, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever-changing area of law. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:55 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
(Editor’s note: This article is adapted from a 2023 policy paper written by the author and Federica D’Alessandra for the Stimson Center. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Michael Shapiro, PTO: if copyright-plus claims are out, would that mean reputational harms aren’t covered? [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 7:00 am by Daniel Byman
Hearings like this one are rare moments when Iraq is given the attention it deserves. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The panel’s ruling signaled an important moment in American jurisprudence, answering a question that had never been addressed by an appeals court: can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of David M. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
As a preliminary matter, I can’t help but reflect for a moment on how we got to where we are: Most people, I think, do not have a quarrel with the bottom-line conclusions and results. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
  And if we hold fast to that truth, in this moment of trial, there is no challenge too great; no mission too hard. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:04 am by Peter Tillers
The Structure of Proof in Modern Trials Peter Tillers © 2010 If one travels across time, continents, and cultures, one needs to attend to the interests and attitudes of one's audience. [read post]
5 May 2022, 1:46 pm by CodeX
Often, legal advisors are pulled in at a last moment, creating bottlenecks for the business often further constricted by a single, tight policy renewal window. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am by RT
Michael Grynberg Confusion is the boundary limit of the TM right. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am by MBettman
“The access to justice that we are concerned about, what is the problem with requiring the court when there is a noncitizen and there is a situation like this, for the court to say you could have immigration problems, have you discussed this with an attorney—how difficult is that to do? [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
In the words of Justice Holmes, writing about the fair report privilege, It is desirable that the trial of causes should take place under the public eye, not because the controversies of one citizen with another are of public concern, but because it is of the highest moment that those who administer justice should always act under the sense of public responsibility, and that every citizen should be able to satisfy himself with his own eyes as to the mode in which a public duty is… [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules Public Officials Can Sometimes Be Sued for Blocking Critics on Social Media Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 3/14/2024 A unanimous Supreme Court ruled public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Readers of Truth on the Market are no doubt aware of Judge Amit Mehta’s Aug. 5 decision in the Google search antitrust case—that is, his 286-page memorandum and order finding Google liable for violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act (specifically, illegal monopoly maintenance in two markets: general search services and general text advertising). [read post]