Search for: "People v Friend" Results 4221 - 4240 of 7,221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm by Katie Smith, ACLU
The stories of women involved in the case, Dukes v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 10:26 am
  Blackberry v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 1:56 pm by Kalvis Golde
” That June, the court struck down the Texas law 5-4 in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The book ends by reprising the opening question, as Aziz and his British (Anglo-Indian) friend, Cyril Fielding, disagree over whether they can be friends before the British leave India and India becomes a nation. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by David Gans
”  Jack argues that the back and forth in these briefs, and particularly the agreement that Romer v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:26 am by Daniel Shaviro
 Too much water under the bridge at this point (even before we get to see what they do in King v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:04 pm
Thankfully, the AmeriKat's paws were able to take a break thanks to Kat friend, Richard Vary (Bird & Bird). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Note that Michael co-filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case on behalf of several former Justice Department officials.) [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 For further details of the event and how to register for it, just click here.For those who ever wondered whereChina is, it's the yellow bit that liesbetween Bhutan and Mongolia ...A katpat goes to the IPKat's Canadian friend Paul Jones for tipping him off with the news that the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, China, has now voted on a third reading to adopt some proposed amendments to the country's Trade Mark Law. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am by Neil Wilkof
Kat friends Beatrice Wee and Hong Qibin examine the case of Burberry Ltd v Megastar Shipping Pte Ltd , in which the Singapore Court of Appeal held that as far as a freight forwarder was concerned, an alleged infringer is only liable for trade mark infringement under section 27 of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”) if it had knowledge or reason to believe that a sign had been affixed on the goods in question. [read post]