Search for: "People v Weeks"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 15,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
The Apple case potentially raises at least these major legal issues: To what extent the government can use the All Writs Act to compel people unrelated to a case to provide unwilling technical support–here, Apple says, 12-40 man-weeks of expert engineering–to the government’s efforts to disable a security system in order to effectuate a search warrant or similar court order; Whether ordering a firm to write code (here, a bespoke phone OS), is a form of compelled… [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 7:04 am
Last week, at the Federalist Society Lawyers Convention in Washington DC, I was on a panelabout Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:52 pm
Putnam and Vosburg v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Everyone in New Zealand was talking about the law of privacy last week. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:46 am
Phason v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
The full judgment is available here [pdf] Next week in the courts On Monday 23 July 2012, Tugendhat J will give judgment in the case of Desmond v Foreman (heard 2 to 3 July 2012). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:53 am
” Katz v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:15 am
March 16, 2010) and People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
Other commentary focuses on last week’s oral arguments in Foster v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of General Counsel v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:48 am
In Smith v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
In McLane v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
(Daniels v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
Earlier this week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its first opinion reviewing a decision in which the District Court applied, or refused to apply, Fifield: Instant Technology LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
Earlier this week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its first opinion reviewing a decision in which the District Court applied, or refused to apply, Fifield: Instant Technology LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
In addition to the arrest of Torres, it is expected that twenty-three people will be arrested or summonsed to court on related drug and firearms offenses. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
., Hart v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I don't see this having that kind of scope, a Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
Supreme Court issued its 1954 decision declaring racial segregation unconstitutional in Brown v. [read post]
