Search for: "Robert A. Brown"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2007, 5:08 am
" Both American racism and Roberts' form of constitutionalism will not be cured until we realize that one doesn't remedy 400 years of legally embedded racism by wishing it away. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
Plaintiffs-appellants Paul Brown, William Fanaly, Charles Thomas, Gary Riggs, Robert Orlikowski, and Scott Way (plaintiffs) filed suit in federal district court against defendants-appellees Cassens Transport Company (Cassens), Crawford & Company (Crawford), and Dr. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:49 pm
The new Fellows are Francoise Baylis (bioethics) at Dalhousie University and James Robert Brown (philosophy of science) at the University of Toronto.... [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
52 year-old Robert Brown wasn't buying it, however. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
In his opinion, Chief Justice Roberts announced that a school district's voluntary adoption of a student assignment plan that relies on race to determine which schools certain children may attend violates the Constitution. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:36 pm
This means that Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:16 am
"But Robert Blecker, a professor at New York Law School and a supporter of the death penalty for the "worst of the worst" offenders, disagrees. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:58 pm
Strom Thurmond's Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:43 am
Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 7:03 am
This decision, known popularly as "Brown [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
In a recent case, Robert Malta sought to recover four rent-stabilized apartments. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 9:49 am
If a possible excuse exists, then the above principles require courts to reject a finding of covert discrimination.Significantly, and this is at the heart of the Strom Thurmond/George Bush/John Roberts understanding of Brown, the instances in which government admits using race and, thus, is held to an extraordinary high burden of proof, are almost always instances when government action is designed to benefit persons of color. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:33 am
Chief Justice Roberts either knows this or he does not. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 12:33 am
It is clear that Lazarus does not conceive of the possibility that a Roberts' Court will be anti-majoritarian in its drive to impose it radical reactionary views. for example Lazarus writes: The 19-year period from 1954 (when the court decided Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:30 pm
Jason Robert Brown. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 1:13 pm
Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 10:49 am
” Tr. of Oral Arg. in Brown I, p. 7 (Robert L. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 8:36 am
What happened in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:16 pm
FEC and what the decision says about the Roberts Court. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Robert D. [read post]
