Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2008, 1:35 pm
(State of Alaska v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:08 am
Martinez, et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:21 pm
It seems that this insistence stems from the right to fair trial, given that the following passage from the matter of South Africa in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:12 am
Creekstone Farms Premium Beef, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 9:13 am
Essentially, software programmers put up programming code that anyone can download, modify, use and distribute for free, as long as the "borrowed" or "open source" code is clearly indicated and enabled for the distributee to copy, download and use.On August 13, 2008, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Jacobsen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 10:46 pm
By Audrey Millemann In Prasco, LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
For the purpose of marketing, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service issued a voluntary standard for grass (forage) fed marketing claims last year that states: “grass fed standard states that grass and/or forage shall be the feed source consumed for the lifetime of the ruminant animal, with the exception of milk consumed prior to weaning. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:24 pm
State, 778 S.W.2d 70 (Tex.Crim.App. 1989) Garcia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
PHS Community Services Society v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:10 am
Rudnicki v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Spoons, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:41 pm
Lemons v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:49 am
Here is the abstract:The egalitarian voice of the United States Supreme Court resonates forty years after it abolished anti-miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jerald Anthony Minzey v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 4:39 am
Along the way, Howard offers some good & useful criticisms of the cultural cognition project's work on Scott v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
Finally, in an effort to strengthen states’ abilities to address fraudulent or inappropriate marketing of plans, effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, MIPPA requires plans to: use only agents and brokers licensed under state law; abide by state appointment laws; report any agent terminations to the state; and comply with state requests for information regarding the performance of agents, brokers, and… [read post]
