Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 5,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 6:51 am
The Fourth Amendment to the United States guarantees a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, conducted by the government. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
Defendants point out, for example, that a court might issue a search warrant for plaintiff Doe’s computer, thus exposing his clients’ and his confidential information to scrutiny by police officers. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
Searches and seizures; invasions of privacy. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:17 am
But if it’s fine with the court that the regulatory exception be invoked as subterfuge for a warrantless criminal search and seizure, thus undermining the putative regulatory purpose, what makes this search excessive? [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:10 am
Probable cause was sufficient for the search under the automobile exception; a warrant was not necessary. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
But if we are discussing the Fourth Amendment's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, heaven forbid that we should intrude on the government's investigatory province and actually require it to abide by the mandates of the Bill of Rights. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Feb. 24, 2006), affirming Judge Hornbaker's suppression of evidence in a Geary County drug prosecution (no actual or apparent authoirty to search bedroom; cannot use inevitable discovery where no warrant ever applied for and not certain). [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:39 am
One of those exceptions is the border search doctrine, which allows routine searches at the border without a warrant or any level of individualized suspicion. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Government Drone Overflights May Violate Fourth Amendment, Trigger Exclusionary Rule
27 Mar 2021, 12:59 pm
However, the Fourth Amendment may protect parties from unreasonable searches and seizures committed by a governmental entity in civil cases, if the civil case can be considered "quasi-criminal" and the search or seizure was committed by the governmental entity pursuing the action. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Search and Seizure, Threshold police inquiry, Probable cause, Automobile. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:38 am
Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012), in which it held that law enforcement’s installing GPS devices on citizens’ vehicles is a 4thAmendment search, which must be justified either by a search warrant or by an exception to the warrant requirement. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
See, e.g., In re Search Warrant for Law Offices, 153 F.R.D. 55 (U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:52 am
Any remaining privacy interest that the defendants had was minimal, and, as we discuss below, was protected by the subsequent warrant obtained prior to the Government’s search. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 5:44 am
The warrant was sufficient and permitted seizure of child porn after it was discovery. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:10 pm
Touted as the most important search and seizure case the Court has heard in a decade, it will be interesting to see how the Bill of Rights has kept pace with ever-changing technology. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:39 am
All events will be held in Pound Hall: http://www.law.harvard.edu/about/map.html * * * * * * My own presentation will be the following: WHY COURTS CANNOT QUANTIFY PROBABLE CAUSE Orin Kerr The government can conduct almost any search or seizure if it has “probable cause. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
The case focuses on the freedom from unreasonable seizures rather than unreasonable searches because the Court has already held, in Illinois v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The court of appeals ruled that the outstanding warrant and the prior seizure, “[i]n addition to the positive indication by the dog,” provided probable cause notwithstanding the possibility that a dog could alert to legal hemp. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:32 pm
And second, if it is a search, is it a search that requires a warrant? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:47 am
Not that search and seizure law is crystalline in its clarity at present, but at least there’s one clear marker: if the police violated the 4th Amendment, the evidence gets thrown out. [read post]
