Search for: "Shields, in Re"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
The court found that a sitting president’s personal information is not shielded from congressional investigation, but it also established a new, stricter test under which the legislature must convince courts that the material should be handed over to Congress. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Session 1 | Ellen Goodman (Rutgers), Moderator Access and Development: The History of ‘Development’ and WIPOSara Bannerman (McMaster University)Commentator | Christopher S. [read post]
19 May 2024, 1:04 pm
You're morehouse men. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
It could re-invent blasphemy under the umbrella of the duty of care. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:55 am
The case-filing report shall be examined and approved by the appropriate CCP discipline inspection organ.[12] The third stage is the investigation stage, which take place after the case has been successfully filed.[13] The “shuanggui” belongs to stage, where the discipline inspection organ must form an investigation team and use the allowed methods to obtain evidence against the accused individual.[14] Although the discipline inspection organ is allowed to restrict the personal freedom… [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm
Tejas Narechania's new paper, Certiorari, Universality, and a Patent Puzzle, forthcoming in Michigan Law Review argues that a major identifying factor for the Supreme Court's interest in patent cases is a field split: an area where a particular patent law doctrine plays out differently in patent law than in other fields of law where it is used. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm
The long international nightmare is not over. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
The final two months of 2018 have been a remarkably eventful period for observers of American civil-military relations—even for the Trump administration. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 5:24 pm
"In recent weeks, our ex-President's associates have tried to use the 74 million Americans who voted to re-elect him as a kind of human shield against criticism. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
But Not Everyone Thinks They’re Broken. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
McCann, No. 06-3257 Denial of a habeas corpus petition from a sentence to life imprisonment for murder is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) Apprendi principles were violated because there was no jury determination establishing the facts necessary to impose an enhanced sentence; 2) defendant never waived his right to a jury trial as to his sentence; 3) double jeopardy barred another sentencing trial so he should be re-sentenced to the maximum term of up to forty years; and… [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 8:43 am
And, indisputably of policy concern, we’re told that many patients report rationing their insulin. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 12:58 pm
One Year After Lewiston, What Might Help Prevent a Repeat? [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:57 pm
Original Article Sex offenders could get trials annually, driving up the legal bills 01/21/2012 By Christine Willmsen Washington's civil-commitment program that shields society from the worst sex offenders is burdened with unchecked legal costs and secrecy, The Seattle Times has found. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Later this month the Supreme Court will hear First Amendment challenges to two state laws that regulate the content policies of large social media platforms. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan's Stay Motion is in Re: Richard Allenv. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
General Assembly recognised Russian responsibility and encouraged the creation of an international compensation mechanism as well as a register of damage (A/RES/ES-11/5). [read post]
26 May 2021, 5:10 pm
However, when we do get to 2026 there is still the possibility that at the end of the 8th year (or really at any other time during their tenure) a Board member could resign (and possibly even be immediately re-appointed) and then contend that they did not serve 8 consecutive and uninterrupted years, thereby making themselves fully eligible to continue to serve without any limitations or restrictions. [read post]
