Search for: "Shields, in Re"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2007, 2:44 pm
Moreover, at least one court has suggested that contractors can never invoke immunity of any sort to shield themselves from human rights claims, see In re Agent Orange Prod. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
See In re All Matters Submitted To The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ("In re FISC"), 218 F. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:10 pm
It could, for instance, mandate that potential residents be notified if the facility is in the hands of corporate investors who have shielded themselves from liability. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:26 am
SCHOLL'S" and "AIR-PILLO" in CombinationSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: Precedential No. 58: TTAB Affirms Disclaimer Requirement of "TOGGS" and 2(d) Refusal of "ZOGGS TOGGS" over "TOG & Design" for Swimsuits TTAB Deems "iPOSTAGE" Merely Descriptive of Internet Postage TTAB Reverses 2(e)(1) Descriptiveness Refusal of "FOLDOVER" for Web-Based Marketing Software TTAB Affirms 2(e)(1) Descriptiveness Refusal of… [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:40 pm
The number of cameras in public areas -- and seemingly shielded public areas like dressing rooms -- make it more than likely that at some point in everyone's life they're going to get caught on tape in a compromising or embarrassing situation. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:46 am
The court also held that the lawyers' constitutional claims were ripe for adjudication and not barred by the doctrines of res judicata or claim preclusion. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 10:01 am
In the latest case addressing this issue, In re Echostar Communications Corp. 448 F.3d 1294 (Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 4:29 am
City of New London), the virtual world cannot expect to be shielded from the shrill call of "hey that's mine! [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:45 am
Re-live that joy and excitement. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:35 am
FN14 This holding compels the Court to examine the statutes at issue to determine (1) whether the Army Corps was given judgment or choice under the applicable statutes in designing the NPCDF and (2) if so, whether the judgment exercised was of the kind discretionary immunity is designed to shield. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
It's everybody else we're worried about. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
In re Zick, 931 F.2d 1124, 1129 (6th Cir.1991). [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 4:16 pm
Your allies once burned the Library of Congress (perhaps with sufficient cause), and used American power as a shield to consolidate an empire. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:14 am
(right: 12 Angry Men because this post will end up being about depositions, settlement and trial and not simply -- yawn -- reinsurance) Business Insurance reported yesterday that the California Supreme Court has Shield[ed] Reinsurance Details in Abuse Case. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 4:52 am
"Applicant contended that, according to In re California Innovations, Inc., 329 F.3d 1334 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:22 am
I've re-read the majority opinion and the dissent, and I have more to say. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
Case: In Re Seagate Technology, LLC, Civ. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:36 am
In In re Seagate Technology, LLC (August 20, 2007), en banc the Federal Circuit overruled Underwater Devices Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
While we almost always have questions relating to the plaintiff's treatment, usually what we're even more interested in is what the prescriber thinks of the drug itself.Was s/he already aware of the claimed risk? [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 3:38 am
A hunch can just be a shield for prejudice. [read post]
