Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 4221 - 4240 of 13,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 12:42 pm by Jeffrey McCoy and Oliver Dunford
On appeal to the commission, Lucia argued that the ALJ was an “officer of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm by Victoria Clark
District Court for the Central District of California to modify the Settlement Agreement in Flores v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Matthew Kolken
District Court for the Central District of California to modify the Settlement Agreement in Flores v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Ruthann Robson
The United States Department of Health issued new guidelines requiring bilingual consent forms and instituting a federal monitoring program. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
Carpenter’s attorneys argue modern cellphone records are fundamentally different than phones used in 1979 and that a more recent Court decision from 2012, United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:55 am by PatentArcade Admin
Mendes et al United States District Court for the Northern District of California CAND-3-17-cv-06223, Filed Oct. 27, 2017 We recently reported on Epic Games […] [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm by Florian Mueller
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California still didn't necessarily have to stay the related infringement claims. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Ken White
United States, the leading case here in the Ninth Circuit applying it. [read post]
At the time of his alleged violation of the state’s civil rights statute, Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages as a matter of state law, and the United States Supreme Court had said nothing to suggest that limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional. [read post]