Search for: "State of Indiana"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 20,442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 9:07 am
Indiana that the prohibition on excessive fines in the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
Indiana, the court ruled unanimously that the Eighth Amendment’s ban on excessive fines applies to states and localities under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:36 am
United States, 509 U. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm
Indiana confirms that state governments, like their federal counterpart, may not impose excessive fines. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 6:03 pm
On January 31, 2019, our client was interviewed at the Indianapolis, Indiana USCIS office. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
Indiana, the United States Supreme Court held that the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is applicable to the states... [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 1:52 pm
The Indiana Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment was not enforceable to the states and therefore the forfeiture was allowed. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 11:53 am
Martinsville Corral, Inc. owns two Texas Corral restaurants in Indiana. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:22 am
But because the state did not make that argument in the Indiana Supreme Court, the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
United States (1993), and Indiana had not asked for Austin to be overruled. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:10 am
Supreme Court Curbs State Power to Levy Fines, Seize Property. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:20 am
The state of Indiana wanted to seize Timbs’ Land Rover under its civil forfeiture laws, arguing it was used to commit a crime. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:18 am
Indiana. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:49 am
20 Feb 2019, 7:30 am
Indiana that the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment, originally applicable only the to federal government, applies to the states as well through the Fourteenth. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
But today the Supreme Court reversed the state court, in another sharp rebuke. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:36 am
A recent state appellate decision illustrates the attractive nuisance doctrine. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:51 am
At the same time, home health providers that operate in Illinois, Ohio, North Carolina, Florida and Texas, and potentially other states within the Palmetto/JM jurisdiction (Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Tennessee) face the likelihood that a revised pre-payment demonstration model will be implemented in the near future. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:03 am
State Sen. [read post]
