Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4221 - 4240 of 9,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Edith Roberts
Keating in 1984, “a national policy favoring arbitration” that pre-empted the authority of states to provide a judicial forum for disputes covered by arbitration clauses. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
Why would an analyst attach a presumption of regularity to the conduct of a president in the first place? [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections, upholding one of 12 Virginia electoral districts against a racial gerrymandering challenge and sending the remaining 11 back to the district court to reconsider whether race was the predominant factor in drawing the district lines. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
 The court upheld one of the districts but ruled that the district court had employed the wrong standard in assessing whether race was the predominant factor in drawing the lines of the other 11 districts, and remanded the case to the district court to evaluate those 11 districts under the proper standard. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:36 am by John Jascob
Furthermore, while the trial court clearly erred in instructing the jury on state of mind, the error did not “seriously impair” the integrity of the proceedings (U.S. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by John Ikard
Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court’s ruling and dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am by Douglas Berman
” But Justice Samuel Alito returned the discussion to reality by highlighting that the challenging statutory issue in this case stemmed from the court’s own decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Yet neither the district court, nor the court of appeals that affirmed the ruling, ordered the PTO to cancel the registration, despite that registration’s invalidity. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
A federal district court and the 9th Circuit held otherwise. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am by Peter Margulies
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Mathews v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Ryan Sharkey
In determining whether Congress implicitly precluded federal district court jurisdiction, the court must first determine if preclusion is discernable from the text, structure, and purpose of the statute. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by Nicandro Iannacci
In an elegant act of “judicial jujitsu,” the Supreme Court issued its decision in Marbury v. [read post]