Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 4221 - 4240 of 156,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm by Scott Limmer
Under state law, she wouldn’t have been eligible for parole until she’d served 51 years. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:44 am
The National Law Journal reports that the bar passage rate on the July 2008 exam rose in several large states, including California (5.6% -- 61.7% in 2008 v. 56.1% in 2007), Massachusetts (3.4% -- 86.4% v. 83.0%), and New York... [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:24 am
Our Broward criminal defense lawyers see this as a relevant issue at a time when law enforcement agencies throughout the state are cracking down on prescription drug crimes. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:21 am by Unknown
United States (Breach of Trust; Fort Laramie Treaty) Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:17 am by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently allowed a “patronage capital” lawsuit to continue in federal court after deciding federal loan conditions and requirements may preempt state laws.[1] One of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture is the Rural Utilities Service (RUS). [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
If the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:02 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law California's so-called anti-paparazzi law has been upheld against a facial First Amendment challenge by a state appellate court in its opinion in Raef v. [read post]