Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 61,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
This means that in Louisiana and Oregon, the two states that previously allowed nonunanimous juries to convict, any final, nonunanimous jury convictions will remain in effect, undisturbed by the Court’s recent holding in Ramos v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:04 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied defendants’ motion (Pirani v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:21 pm
Silver v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:20 am
He states that checking no means Ms. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
That lawsuit, Boudreaux v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 7:29 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
; (3) If she has ceased to be subject to the legislation of the UK within the meaning of art 13(2)(f), is the UK obliged or merely permitted by virtue of Point 20 of annex VI to apply the provisions of Chapter 1 of Title III to the Regulation to her? [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
In BG Group PLC v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:58 am
250px-Ruger_P89_3.png In felon in possession of firearms trial, agent's use of books and computer databases to conclude that the charged firearms were manufactured out of state and therefore traveled in interstate commerce (an element of the offense), did not mean that his testimony was offered "to prove the content" of the books and computer files used; the FRE 1002 best evidence rule did not require submission of the books and computer files into… [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:49 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
Div. 2010), A-4786-08, October 5, 2010: In DYFS v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 6:49 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in Hauck, states at the referred to passage (emphasis added):99. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Sveen v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:53 pm
It is doubtful whether Clause 14, stating that publish and publication have the meaning they have for the purposes of defamation law generally, is sufficient. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Arson and damage to property, utilities, or means of transportation or communication by fire or explosive. 27. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 8:06 am
United States v. [read post]
