Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 11,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 3:51 pm
On July 27, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, threw out claims that Maker’s Mark violated California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and False Advertising Law (FAL), ruling that the plaintiffs did not plausibly allege a likelihood of deception. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm
The court, however, found that the two were analogous and that several California courts had looked to Rule 23 for guidance on state law class action issues. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:48 am
This latter holding may therefore be undone by California state courts, and this precise issue is before the California Supreme Court in Adolph v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 5:23 am
A covered entity is a business entity organized under the laws of any U.S. state with revenues in excess of $500 million and that does business in California. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 1:31 pm
It is wonderful for agencies to provide surrogates and intended parents with the names of qualified counsel, but ultimately every client has a right to choose their own attorney under State Bar rules. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
A federal district court in California has denied the studios’ motion to dismiss, finding that the federal and California antitrust claims were sufficiently pleaded and not time-barred (In re Animation Workers Antitrust Litigation, August 20, 2015, Koh, L.). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
Finally, at Slate, Rick Hasen comments on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Campaign Finance Canada: “Doug Ford’s Campaign Finance Law Struck Down by Court” by Robert Benzie for Toronto Star Massachusetts: “Campaign Finance Regulators Investigating Whether MassGOP Coordinated with Super PAC, in Violation of Law” by Emma Platoff (Boston Globe) for MSN Elections National: “Election Deniers Take Aim at Group That Helps States Maintain Voter Rolls” by Amy Gardner (Washington Post) for MSN… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:29 pm
The number of ADA filings in state courts is unavailable, but likely runs in the thousands. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:18 am
Thus, finding that there was good cause to discipline counsel, the court stated that it would file a disciplinary complaint against each of them with the California State Bar. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:49 am
One contributor to the California Continuing Education of the Bar blog warns: “Take your responsibility to meet and confer very seriously because there’s a big stick associated with it: the court must impose monetary sanctions on any party or attorney who fails to meet and confer in good faith, even if the party subject to the sanction prevails on the discovery motion. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:09 am
Supreme Court, the 13 U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 1:35 pm
The Court issued only a simple order, without explanation for any of the votes, that kept intact a California’s federal judge’s temporary but nationwide ban on enforcing the asylum limitations. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:40 pm
She has also served as chair of the State Bar’s Committee on Appellate Courts, chair of the Appellate Law Advisory Commission of the Board of Legal Specialization and President of the Ventura County Bar Association. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:24 pm
As a result, they could lead to badly-needed investment in downtown areas in California, which would provide more opportunities for infill in general. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:10 am
The availability of the conditional examination is just one more reason why it's critical to have a State Bar Certified Specialist in Criminal Law defending you in your time of crisis. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 pm
The state is now the 38th in the country to pass such a measure. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
Southern California's larger legal community makes this kind of case less likely in Orange County, but businesses and lawyers across the United States should be barred from abusing their power. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 8:36 pm
Justice Paul Coffee, writing for the Court of Appeal, cited In re Stevens (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1228, in which the court held that a convicted sex offender could not, as a condition of parole, be barred from using a computer where the offense did not involve computers. [read post]
