Search for: "United States v. Brown"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2021, 4:22 am
On the surface, this would appear to be a flagrant violation of the Equal Protection Clause if it happened in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:54 pm
Whitman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
One hopes that, sixty-two years after Brown v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
United States (1878). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer… [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
United States, 816 F.2d 647, 657 (Fed. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States, to name but a few. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
