Search for: "United States v. Gooding" Results 4221 - 4240 of 18,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2016, 9:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
One distinction between the United States and a totalitarian state is that the government cannot drag us out of our homes and deny us our freedom without any reason. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
In particular, the defendants claimed that (1) the California judgment was unenforceable for lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) the agreement was unenforceable under the HSSA because the plaintiff failed to advise the defendants of their cancellation rights, and (3) the plaintiff failed to mitigate its damages and breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:28 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ColoradoOpinion Date: 6/12/09Cite: Haggard v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 2:53 pm by Larry
Accordingly, the Court of International granted summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm by Thomas James
The United States Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
 The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its Community word mark IMPULSE in the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy [the product seems to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray]. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 2:40 pm
The decision in a recent federal court case against the United States Library of Congress shows clearly the risk an employer takes when making employment decisions based on a person’s gender identity. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
Most of the time, those decisions are made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.On Monday, the parties' lawyers delivered their opening arguments. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
And those who are intratextually minded are likely to consider the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides:"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by Robert J. McKennon
The federal courts have for a long time struggled with how to apply the deferential standard of review to actions taken by ERISA plan administrators in light of the United States Supreme Court holding in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:57 am by The Charge
United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957) in which it afforded broad discovery opportunities in federal criminal cases. [read post]