Search for: "X, Y "
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2007, 7:08 am
Company X's employee (who is bound by a non-compete agreement) resigns and begins working for Company Y (a competitor of Company X). [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 7:08 am
Company X's employee (who is bound by a non-compete agreement) resigns and begins working for Company Y (a competitor of Company X). [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
Se presume que el peligro no estuvo en "el acto" x, sino en el mismo autor, que se encuentra alienado. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:20 pm
That is if single author A publishes one work in journal X, and then author A publishes the identical work in journal Y without referencing the prior work in journal X, that is a form of plagiarism. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:56 am
Otherwise, this is almost perfect for a Gen X/Y Dinner Party.Oh wait, that's the Reality Bites soundtrack. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
The current generation, generation X, or Y, or XY, takes all this for granted, acting as if it is an unqualified good. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
There's a robust debate in the marketing literature over whether comparative advertising is even a good idea for a challenger brand.Background: in 1969, the FTC decided to encourage naming competitors in ads because names were more useful to consumers than comparisons with "Brand X. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:08 am
In the Metabolite case, the claim at issue was (schematically) a method of measuring a deficiency of X in warm-blooded animals by assaying a body fluid for an elevated level of Y and correlating an elevated level of Y with a deficiency in X. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:56 am
Does it involve a process similar to "X"? [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 9:17 pm
Take notice, you work-life balancing Gen X and Y weenies--they don't make 'em like Geoff and me any more. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
A parallel could be between a duty imposed by statute and a duty where the statute permits a decision to made having regard to factors x, y and z. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The 15th amendment reads:The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.It's easy for modern Americans to think of that as little more than pious boilerplate, like the want ads that assure you Company X is an equal opportunity employer and that University Y "encourages applications from women and persons of diverse… [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:18 pm
I am going to argue Y and show how brilliant I am. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 7:35 pm
Thanks to WisBLawg from the UW Law Library, we are directed to a March 7, 2007 Findlaw article titled, Why are Women - and Gen X and Y Attorneys, Generally Leaving giving us great follow-up to the provocative piece quoted... [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:45 pm
Findlaw has a very interesting article on Why are Women -- and Generation X and Y Attorneys Generally -Leaving Large Law Firms? [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
These include X and Y references cited by an examiner in a jurisdiction outside of Israel, as well as any other references the applicant wishes to submit to the Examiner. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:16 am
Au plaisir de vous y voir! [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:36 am
What were the real-world consequences of Microsoft doing X? [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 1:23 pm
Findlaw columnist Julie Hilden has a column up today entitled Why are Women -- and Generation X and Y Attorneys Generally -- Leaving Large Law Firms? [read post]
