Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 4241 - 4260 of 14,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2017, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Kellogg Brown & Root, which involves the Alien Tort Statute; Fourth Amendment cases Collins v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:26 pm by Atiba Ellis
(And, as evidence is showing, the statues at issue now went up precisely to signal the ascendancy of white supremacy, both in the 1920s at the height of Jim Crow and 1950s in mass resistance to the racial integration demanded by Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 10:57 am by Alfred Brophy
  Topeka features affordable housing with beautiful, historic neighborhoods filled with well-maintained parks, and is the home of the Brown v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood discusses the foundation’s amicus brief in Christie v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 1:01 pm
Similarly, the magistrate could have relied on information provided to Officer Brown by other law enforcement officers. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
The US Supreme Court has spoken directly on this point in Young v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 3:32 pm by Sandy Levinson
 In it we argue that academic (and other) writing on executive power adopts the "neutral principles" approach so (in)famously posited by Herbert Wechsler some sixty years ago, when he used his analysis to explain why  Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:12 am by Liah Caravalho
He is also author of several books including “From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality” (Oxford University Press, 2004), which received the 2005 Bancroft Prize in History; “Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 2:48 am by NCC Staff
  Arguably his biggest win was the case of Brown v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says there is no case.The case is Basinski v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 5:26 am by Charles Sartain
Judge Brown agreed, contending it was legal error to impose solidary liability on a mortgagee with only a security interest. [read post]