Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 4241 - 4260 of 15,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) put an end to all suspense and resistance, stating it was perfectly legal for a contract to stipulate that the buyer bears the re-sale right royalty in the context of a sale between professionals, thereby siding with the CJEU (here). [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:34 am by John Wright
Medical Marijuana Card Holders Cannot Own Firearms In Nevada On August 31, 2016, in a 3-0 ruling in Wilson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:34 am by John Wright
Medical Marijuana Card Holders Cannot Own Firearms In Nevada On August 31, 2016, in a 3-0 ruling in Wilson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
  Though, in that regard, it probably bears mention that this is the Fifth District. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:25 am by Joel R. Brandes
          In Mohácsi v Sofia, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2018 WL 5818541 (EDNY, 2018) the district court denied the fathers petition for the immediate return of his son NIR to Hungary. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Defendant alternatively argued that if the articles did bear an Interception Meaning, it was no graver than Chase Level Two. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 8:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This standard is more strict than the test for state-law malicious prosecution claims.The case is Lanning v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 11:07 am by Eric Goldman
Coleman) * The DTSA’s Ex Parte Seizure Order: The “Ex” Stands for “Extraordinary” (Guest Blog Post) * Another Court Rejects DTSA Ex Parte Seizure–Brunswick Rail v Sultanov * Court Benchslaps Trade Secret Plaintiff and Counsel For Bad Faith Litigation–RBC Bearings v. [read post]