Search for: "California v. Law" Results 4241 - 4260 of 34,248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2021, 6:26 am
Miller (University of Iowa), on Tuesday, December 21, 2021 Tags: Adverse effects, Cash flows, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities litigation COP26 and the Role of Private Capital Posted by Jennie Morawetz, Paul Barker, and James Dolphin, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Tuesday, December 21, 2021 Tags: Climate change, ESG, International… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
One case which may give some insight into how this may go is Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm by Florian Mueller
As a motion to quash subpoenas shows, the CAF was at some point represented by the Kanter Law Group, the law firm of Jonathan Kanter, who is now the U.S. antitrust chief (official title: Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, DOJ).Let me also report on a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  The California Supreme Court doesn't feel that issue's sufficiently important to grant review.But the United States Supreme Court does. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia A leading defamation judge in Sydney has joined legal experts in criticising the Morrison government’s proposed anti-troll law. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 9:03 am by Eric Goldman
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Institute for Justice (2011): Your summarist is asked by his boss for an opinion on the then-recently-filed case Kerr v. [read post]
But the California state court determined that the agreement could not be enforced under state law. [read post]