Search for: "DAVIE v. STATE"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 5,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
Clifford Davis in the “heart of the hood” and represented poor people in all aspects of law – criminal, civil, probate. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:33 am
A short time later, a second collision occurred that involved the motorcyclist, a Honda CR-V and possibly a big-rig, Glace said. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
DoD’s Law of War Manual, § 15.4.2; the current availability of which is contested, see Bothe ¶ 28; Davis). [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), Davis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm
State v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:34 pm
When the Court turned to the second case, Virginia v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
The original precedent set in the Tennessee case of Davis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Lopez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on Monday by telephone in Pham v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
From Tharp v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
The case was Doe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
An intersting recent exception is State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s announcement in New York Times v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
“They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am
This decision is only the second application by a state supreme court of the rule of capture to hydraulic fracturing (from Texas, Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
Sep. 26, 2008)(per curiam) (condemnation appeal, State prevails)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]