Search for: "Day v. Smith" Results 4241 - 4260 of 4,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 6:23 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:41 pm
And it's a case involving a model jury instruction that even the majority opinion concedes could probably be written a lot better.This opinion was filed almost two full years (to the day) after oral argument. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),Proponents: Slow better than poor for WIPO Development Agenda: (Intellectual Property Watch),Chatham House Rule comes to WIPO Development Agenda: (IP Updates),New campaign by a group of Second Life Avatars to raise awareness of the ‘theft’ of virtual items: (IPKat), (Patry Copyright Blog),World IP Day is on the way: (IPKat),Watch for IP leaks from publications: (Securing Innovation),Lessig’s (Government) FOSS market: (IPcentral.info),Notions of free:… [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:03 pm
Smith, No. 07-0758 [docket sheet]. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:25 pm
Todd Smith, author of the recently-launched Texas Appellate Law Blog, offered up an interesting piece yesterday on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Hall Street Associates LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:38 am
Smith (Jean) v Northamptonshire County Council Court of Appeal “A council which had no control over a ramp not on its property was not strictly liable to an employee who was injured on it. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:05 am
Gordon Smith at Conglomerate has commentary on this. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 pm
Franklin Logistics, Inc., Smith Transportation (NFP) - "Plaintiff-Appellant Mari A. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:32 am
Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police Court of Appeal “While it was not reasonable to expect the police to answer in damages to every individual whose life or health might have been spared or saved by more competent police work, where someone's life or safety had been so firmly placed in their hands as to make it incumbent on them to take at least elementary steps to protect it, unexcused neglect to do so could sound in damages if harm resulted. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
Even in the early days, there were disputes about what this phrase meant. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
A “difference” apparently not even demonstrated in the circus-like antics of Broward County Judge Larry Seidlin, who presided over the Anna Nicole Smith probate proceeding). [read post]