Search for: "Doe Officers"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 137,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 12:00 am
By information does require a preliminary hearing. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:42 pm
Michael McConnell: "'Narrow' or 'Sweeping'—What's Does Originalist Evidence Have to Say? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
” ** Does not include monetary benefits obtained through litigation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
” Before addressing the substance of the argument itself, it’s important to distinguish it from another, more draconian “non-self-execution” argument that no party is making but that has been prominent in some public discussions of the case—namely, that Section 3 does not apply to disqualify anyone from any office absent congressional legislation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
Learn more about Aggravated Assault, including Aggravated Assault by Threat (which does not require any injury) below. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Biden might well win the election (even under the absurdly anti-democratic rules that govern current elections, from the Electoral College to Republicans' aggressive -- and depressingly successful -- voter suppression efforts), but that does not mean that he would in fact be able to stay in office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:24 am
According to a representative from the city attorney’s office, any future bans or certain areas where street vendors might be prohibited would require legal reasoning that pertain to health, safety and welfare. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
A short excerpt from today's long decision by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Newman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
Judge Bryson held “that IPR estoppel does not apply to device art, even when that device art is cumulative of patents and printed publications that were or could have been asserted in a prior IPR. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
Why does Chairwoman Rosenworcel View AI Telemarketing as Problematic? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:18 am
We'll see what the Supreme Court does with this.The post Former Presidents Do Not Enjoy Blanket Criminal Immunity appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:02 am
Wise, Toronto Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:58 am
Frequently Asked Questions Does everyone get a ballot in the mail? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:40 am
Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas (SDTX) are handling the matter with assistance from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:28 am
Does the property owner or management have a protocol to check guests for deadly weapons prior to entering the establishment? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:16 am
While the individual serving in the capacity of president of the association does not cast a vote that has a greater weight than the other directors or officers, they are often responsible for setting the tone for effective administrative oversight. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
His brief indicates that the lawyer believes Trump’s strongest argument is that Section 3 does not apply to the former president because a president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
Just as the Constitution consists of its text and not its legislative history, how much more is it the case that the Constitution does not consist of silence in its legislative history. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:58 am
” Finally, the Program explicitly states that it is limited to SDNY and “does not apply to any other United States Attorney’s Office or any other litigating component of the Justice Department. [read post]
