Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 4241 - 4260
of 5,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2011, 1:10 pm
Saiyed Mohmad Mirasaheb Kadri & Others (1987) 3 SCC 538, this Court held that in a case where a tenant becomes a partner of a partnership firm and allows the firm to carry on business in the demised premises while he himself retains legal possession thereof, the act of the landlord does not amount to subletting. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:41 am
The proper analysis is therefore to regard the arbitrator’s contract as a sui generis agreement specifying the terms on which this adjudicative function is to be exercised vis-à-vis particular parties and on particular terms. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:26 am
First, some examples from domestic case law will demonstrate the methodological approach taken vis-à-vis the interaction between the ECHR and the exception clause of ordre public). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:15 am
It should not affect your judgment vis a vis your advice and opinions rendered to your client, nor should you try to influence the judgment and opinions of a judge in a pending matter. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
” Nor does the activity/inactivity distinction withstand careful scrutiny as a principle of constitutional law. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:43 am
Chapter VI of Mulla's "Principles of Mahomedan Law" deals with the general rules of inheritance under Mohammedan law. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:54 am
Should the non-debtor spouse predecease the debtor spouse, then the judgment creditor will take ownership of the property vis-a-vis ownership of the debtor spouse's right of survivorship. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:05 am
ARTICLE VI: ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS … Section 2. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Article 5(2) of the 1998 Rome Statute mandated states parties to determine the conditions for the exercise of ICC jurisdiction vis-à-vis the crime of aggression. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm
More concretely, does the ACA’s minimum coverage provision regulate the “passive inactivity” of doing nothing? [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
Such reliance does not affect petitioners' obligation to demonstrate that they meet all requirements of this paragraph as required by subparagraph (C)(i).';(2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking `include to,' and inserting `include'; and(3) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (8) and inserting after paragraph (4) the following:`(5) EXCEPTION FOR OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES-`(A) IN GENERAL- Subsection (a) shall not apply to an off-highway vehicle. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
Br. vi. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:41 pm
The defendants moved to dismiss for lack of diversity, arguing that Washington was a VI citizen, not a Texas citizen. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:46 am
Fundamental differences in the priorities between the two mother companies can and does take place. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:35 pm
Brussels I Review – Interface with Arbitration The Brussels I Regulation’s interface with arbitration vies with choice... [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
(vi) the court should take care to ensure that it does not discourage parties from settling judicial review proceedings for example by a local authority making a concession at an early stage The Court of Appeal notes that in subsequent cases applying the Boxall guidelines, the expression "plain and obvious" has been applied in relation to (iv) and (v). [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
(vi) the court should take care to ensure that it does not discourage parties from settling judicial review proceedings for example by a local authority making a concession at an early stage The Court of Appeal notes that in subsequent cases applying the Boxall guidelines, the expression "plain and obvious" has been applied in relation to (iv) and (v). [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
The applicant applied for restitution of rights pursuant to A 122.The RS refused restitution of rights on the single ground that A 122 provides only for restoration of rights where there has been failure to observe a time limit which it is for the applicant to observe, whereas the time limit not observed in the present case was one which it was for the UKPO to observe.The Board agrees with the RS:[2] While it is clear that the appellant and its representative were in no way responsible for what has… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
Proving tribal affiliation by permanent tattooing Everyone knows the damage the Rent Control Act does. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:57 pm
Does a public road right of way abut the property? [read post]
