Search for: "Doe v. Brown" Results 4241 - 4260 of 5,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  He can go over the top a lot of times, especially in dissent, but then there’s this footnote to the decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:00 am by webmaster
Following on the Second Appellate District’s extensive and closely-reasoned holding in Brown v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:00 am by webmaster
Following on the Second Appellate District’s extensive and closely-reasoned holding in Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
Brown Clinic, P.L.L.P., 531 F.3d 568, 574-75 (8th Cir. 2008).Washington:  Larson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
  Two weeks ago, in State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
In determining whether or not the judgment will be enforced, the court will evaluate what “comity,” as defined in Hilton v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:51 pm
The NCAA 2010-2011 Division I Manual does not appear to discuss Social Media/Social Networking Monitoring and/or censorship so I am not sure how any NCAA institution thinks that it is acceptable to monitor and then censor its student-athletes.In Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:45 am by Mike Rappaport
In fact, nearly no one today is a true equal protection originalist, because true equal protection originalism would repudiate Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:44 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday two trade groups representing the video games industry filed a motion seeking over one million dollars in legal fees and expenses for the Supreme Court proceedings in Brown v. [read post]