Search for: "Does 1 - 38" Results 4241 - 4260 of 4,952
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2009, 6:46 am
In Georgia, Troy Anthony Davis represents 1 of 51 Blacks (47%) on death row out of a total of 109 inmates. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 10:00 am
Brady Press Briefing Room 1:27 P.M. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:01 pm
I'm speaking for the almost 1 million sex offenders and their families," _____ said. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 9:48 am
According to their research based on studying over 4 million jailbroken devices, 38 percent of users have at least one pirated application installed. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
But it's just as important that we accomplish health insurance reform for the Americans who do have health insurance -- (applause) -- because right now we have a health care system that too often works better for the insurance industry than it does for the American people. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 7:06 pm
What’s your official title and what does it mean? [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 11:02 pm
He or she does not necessarily have to agree with everything we say but should not be embarrassed, appalled, or angry at anything we say. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 6:53 am
Spinelli claims that the only applicable regulation that permits the police to search a gun store's premises in New York City is 38 RCNY § 1-06(i), which creates a "cooperative inspection program" whereby gun store owners can set up a time for a voluntary police inspection. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
The last legal malpractice case that i handled involved a young lady who was 38 weeks pregnant. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 9:52 pm
For those one overpaid, one does not immediately book an asset of a $1 million receivable: instead, one books that as the monies flow in. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 12:57 pm
Brett Trout Tags: ATT, cyber law, iPhone, iPod Related posts iPhone Legalease (0) Worry About Internet Law Because . . . (1) Will AT&T be Steaming Open Your e-mail? [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:33 pm
No. 1528 (S.C.), where the court held at para. 17 that lack of timeliness does not necessarily preclude an application to strike a jury notice. [read post]