Search for: "Eugene Volokh"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 9,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 9:21 am
From a federal district court opinion I was just reading, The Court strongly disfavors footnoted legal citations. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:42 am
In Young v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:54 am
A commenter on the aborted fetus sign thread asks, What about a sign showing images of naked women? [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:26 pm
An interesting dissent from denial of review by Texas's high court for criminal cases.From today's opinion in Ogle v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:47 am
From yesterday's Seventh Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm
As all of you must have heard by now, Johnny Depp won his libel case against Amber Heard, and was awarded $10 million in compensatory damages plus $5 million in punitive damages (but Virginia law reduces the punitive award to $350,000). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Over the last couple of years, I've been looking closely at injunctions against libel, and I've come to agree with the emerging view in recent appellate court decisions -- such injunctions, if properly crafted, are constitutional. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:57 pm
For an excerpt from Kaminer's original op-ed, as well as David Cole's and Nadine Strossen's disagreement with Kaminer—and Ira Glasser's response largely agreeing with Kaminer—see this post. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:29 pm
["For years, a Grey’s Anatomy writer told her personal traumas in online essays, and wove those details into the show’s plot—until a surprising email to Shondaland accused her of making it all up. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 8:20 am
An interesting article by Jacob Mchangama and Jules White (Time); an excerpt: The material of a long dead comedian is a good example of content that the world´s leading GenAI systems find "harmful. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 11:12 am
"While not a criminal matter, an order of protection exposes a respondent to an array of restrictions, including severe limitations on his or her Second Amendment rights. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
The Sixth Circuit reaffirms this, including for sexual assault accusations, in a case against the University of Michigan; and the court also allows plaintiff to proceed with his claim that the process was biased against him because of his sex.From Friday's Doe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 12:24 pm
If you're putting a whole sentence in parentheses, the custom follows logic -- put the period inside the parentheses, not outside it. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:18 am
A "found editing exercise" (by analogy to found poetry) just seen in an office kitchen. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:38 am
The Double Jeopardy Clause generally bars the government from prosecuting a person twice for the same offense, regardless of whether the first prosecution led to an acquittal or a conviction. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:29 am
I read this and much enjoyed it some years ago; it's an urban fantasy set at Yale, and I expect that people with some Yale or New Haven experience would enjoy it even more. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 9:35 am
Say that you apply to many schools, including some where other students have much better predictors (chiefly test scores and grades from earlier institutions) than you. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:54 am
Orin posts about the substance below, and notes that the court adopted an approach that he had advocated, but I wanted to add that the opinion cited four separate law review articles of his, nine times in total. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
The government may not discriminate against businesses because of the political views the business (or its spokesman) has expressed.GoLocalProv News reports that the town council of a Providence-area town "voted 3-2 in favor of a resolution Monday night requesting the town and school department refrain from purchasing Nike products, after Colin Kaepernick became the recent face of the company. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 5:19 am
From a post (not by Michael Dorf) on Dorf on Law: Just about everyone is expecting Justice Gorsuch to vote with the conservatives [in Janus v. [read post]
