Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 4241 - 4260 of 16,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2019, 11:10 am by MBettman
” United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am by Randolph Rice
Maximum Penalty: If convicted, the maximum penalty is 3 years in jail and a fine of not less than $250 and not exceeding $2,500.00. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am by Randolph Rice
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this sectio [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Most notably and most recently, the California Supreme Court ruled for the defense in O’Neil v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The EFF argued that the embedding of Section 230 into NAFTA/USMCA “could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:53 am
For charges related to any amount of Schedule V Substances: A first offense may be punishable with a fine up to $100,000 and/or a jail sentence of up to 1 year in prison. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Floris ten Have; Stijn de Jong discuss Orange Polska v Commission: Abuse of Dominance, Fines & Effects. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 5:02 am by Dave
  HHJ Luba found the arguments to be finely balanced and was “anxious that the present tension of the authorities on these issues should be resolved” [96]. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:32 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Desarrollar más vías para distribuir y completar el mismo -tales como esta nueva herramienta- ayudaría a que miles tuvieran la oportunidad de acceder a asistencia y reparar sus hogares. [read post]