Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 6,188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
After considering evidence about a conversation that husband purportedly had with one of its employees, the Office of Personnel Management affirmed, stating that husband could have elected to receive a reduced lifetime annuity with survivor benefits for a new wife only by notifying OPM of his intentions in a signed writing within two years of his marriage, 5 U.S.C. 8339(k)(2)(A). [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:16 am
The husband's application and wife's opposition each included a Case Information Statement presenting disparate pictures of the marital lifestyle for reference by the trial court in analyzing husband's claims for relief (not surprisingly, husband's presented marital lifestyle was far lower than that portrayed by wife). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
There’s an old movie, a comedy, where the husband is caught in bed with another woman by his wife. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
’ That ‘violence’ goes beyond phsyical harm or threats of physical harm was confirmed by the the Supreme Court in Yemshaw v London Borough of Hounslow [2011] UKSC 3 where in the context of section 177(1) of the Housing Act 1996, a husband shouting at his wife would be sufficient conduct to fall within that Act’s definition of ‘violence. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:49 am
In Ingraham v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:30 am
For example, About Lawsuits reported this week on a new case filed by the wife of an Iraqi war veteran against a Veteran’s Administration hospital. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:32 pm
In Edge v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:47 am
"Accordingly, he quantified the husband's reversionary interest at one third of the capital awarded to the wife (paragraph 23), to be expressed in the bricks and mortar in which the money is invested, so: "that the property to be acquired by the wife in an assumed purchase at about £285,000 will be charged as to one third of its equity in favour of the husband, that charge to be redeemed when the twins achieve maturity".Lord… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:13 am
The August 31, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion in Nestberg v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:11 pm
Bauer, 287 S.C. 217, 337 S.E.2d 211, 212 (1985) (reversing family court’s 50/50 award of marital home and awarding marital home to wife, in part because of wife’s parents furnished down payment on home); Barr v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:18 am
Michele and Christopher Paige, wife and husband, sought to enter the world of hedge fund management. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am
Frenchman ordered to pay ex-wife £9,000 for not having sex after marriage [Daily Mail] Man Ordered to Pay Ex-Wife $14,000 Over Lack of Sex [Gawker] Frenchman Ordered to Pay Wife for Lack of Sex [Constitutional Daily]MONIQUE v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:29 am
Oh, and to show you just how much fun handling these cases can be, the husband suspected his wife of having an affair, and when she returned from a trip, he stuffed her underwear into a bag and took it to his lawyer’s office so it could be tested for semen. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:35 pm
CL’s husband deployed, asking a family friend, Specialist Jackson, to look after his wife. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
The wife challenged the husband's factual case on this issue, contending that the value achieved on the sale reflected a number of factors, of which the husband's role post-separation was just one. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
Appellate Court of Illinois, First Judicial District: Miner v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Anyways, they still think it's 2007 down there: We agree with the wife that the trial court erred and abused its discretion in awarding the husband a “special equity” in the parties’ jointly owned marital residence. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
Parker, 41 AD3d 852; Matter of Cassieri v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:34 pm
Yesterday, in the case of Lindo v. [read post]
Family law amendments, felony DUI, sentencing, securities fraud and a busy week in the court kitchen
28 Aug 2011, 6:15 pm
Criminal law -- Wiggs v. [read post]
