Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 4,789
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 6:18 pm
Hathaway tackled the issue from an interesting perspective in a June 2009 Florida Bar Journal article entitled Make It an Even 10: Courts Rely on More Than the Seven Carpenter Factors to Analyze a Claim for Undue Influence of a Will or Trust. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:33 am
There are no estate planning opportunities. c. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:20 pm
And even if he did, would you be interested in pursuing probably expensive, time-consuming civil litigation while you're facing the prospect of spending 90 years in jail? [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 1:49 pm
Although this figure seems legally, if not morally,excessive, it must be remembered that section 504(c)(2) of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
A2006
Weinstein -- Expands definition of "property of another", for purposes of criminal mischief, to include any property another person has an interest in Same as S 4306
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date45
05/29/2009
05/29/2009Last Act: 05/29/09 signed chap.45Last Action Date: 06/01/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
A2006
Weinstein -- Expands definition of "property of another", for purposes of criminal mischief, to include any property another person has an interest in Same as S 4306
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date45
05/29/2009
05/29/2009Last Act: 05/29/09 signed chap.45Last Action Date: 06/01/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
At the press conference, it was said that this is “not a privacy issue, but a child safety issue. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:41 pm
It is anticipated that any such report would include (A) a review of the incidence of, and reasons for, departures and variances from the guideline sentence; (B) a compilation of studies on, and analysis of, recidivism by child pornography offenders; and (C) recommendations to Congress on any statutory changes that may be appropriate. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
The search warrant in this child porn case was constitutionally particular when it sought seizure of defendant's electronic media for child porn. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
The government showed that defendant voluntarily consented to the search of his computer for child porn. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:14 pm
Code § 2251(c) and transporting child pornography in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
In fact, the court considers all relevant information and makes a determination “in the best interests of the child. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
Pick your targeted material: a) child porn, b) terrorism materials, c) gambling, or d) “obscene” content. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:05 am
There was PC for a child pornography search of defendant's computer. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 8:48 am
The other day, I did a quick post in a pique of anger at the US criticizing China's Human Rights record while Barack Obama was travelling in or to Saudia Arabia and Egypt. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-08-00469-CV, ___ SW3d ___, [per curiam opinion of the San Antonio Court of Appeals denying mandamus relief] 07-23-08) stay order issued October 10, 2008, liftedPursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court conditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
The General Municipal Law Section 207-a/c Case BookA Guide to Disability Leave for those involved inLaw Enforcement and Firefighting in New York State2009 Edition, 1098 pagesThe Section 207-a/c Case Book is an electronic handbook for administrators, union officials and attorneys involved with General Municipal Law Sections 207-a and 207-c benefits available to law enforcement personnel and firefighters suffering job related injuries. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:09 am
Valley Stream 24 U.F.S.D.MONROE COUNTYFamily LawCourt Denies DHS Request to Be Excused From Assisting in Parent, Child ReunificationMatter of Terrence C. v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 7:36 am
Co-driver with owner of truck was capable of consent, even though owner (defendant, with a superior legal interest) was also present. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:30 am
Here comes the interesting part. [read post]
