Search for: "In re T. W."
Results 4241 - 4260
of 8,738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 1:01 am
(Just because you’re a “criminal” doesn’t mean you are not also an “enemy combatant. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:38 pm
For example, in In re Fallaux, we recognized “that the unjustified patent term extension justification for obviousness-type double patenting” may have “limited force in . . . many double patenting rejections today, in no small part because of the change in the Patent Act from a patent term of seventeen years from issuance to a term of twenty years from filing. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
Hingegen wäre es ausser in Ausnahmefällen nicht verhältnismässig, eine störende Drohne abzuschiessen oder anderweitig zu beschädigen. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Similarly in In re Fosamax Litigation, 2012 WL 181411 (D.N.J. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 1:18 pm
Case Study: In the linked-to order above a Palm Beach County probate judge ordered that W. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Cir. 1999),“[w]hen multiple patents derive from the same initial application, the prosecution history regarding a claim limitation in any patent that has issued applies with equal force to subsequently issued patents that contain the same claim limitation. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:55 pm
© 2014 Casey W. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:55 pm
© 2014 Casey W. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:58 am
In February I wrote that "[w]e m[ight] very well see one or more mandamus petitions in this context" because "these defendants won't leave a stone unturned in their attempts to move the matter out of Texas. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am
We don’t learn about capability two, again because of redactions. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 5:13 am
And we didn't fix it when we left. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:38 pm
We don't know yet how long state election officials will keep the window open, and there don't seem to be any standards in the statute or elsewhere to help them. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 9:28 am
” The President specifically stated: “I don’t think we’re going to solve this problem in weeks. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:07 pm
Hinckley’s lawyer, Barry W. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:08 pm
Here is 75-year-old John Koskinen in a recent interview with Tax Analysts’ William Hoffman: [W]e have a huge turnover in people under 30 because we’re not hiring that many. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Don’t you need a work first? [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 1:49 pm
She won’t go so far as to say judges start w/ result and then give reasons, but much academic literature on how judges think is a little weird for judges (bugs under microscope). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
A: still refining that, but one of the problems w/these types of claims is how you do define the participants. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 9:44 am
Assume we’re certain that our regime will produce any unit of knowledge we want. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:42 am
Or, at the very least, could I secure flexibility to re-use my work? [read post]
