Search for: "JAMES V. STATE"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 10,686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am
And April Doss defended the 9th Circuit’s reading of the government’s ability to use information collected through 702 surveillance in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3, Baroness Hale noted that Article 8 had been held to include the right to establish and develop relationships with others. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:59 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
James, 424 Mass. 770, 778 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1997). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 4:49 pm
This apportionment would make the rural states less important than they are now, but as James Madison might have said, them's the breaks. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
Attorneys for 57-year-old Bobby James Moore argue the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest court in the state, disregarded existing medical standards in favor of outdated ones when it decided Moore wasn’t mentally disabled. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
Attorneys for 57-year-old Bobby James Moore argue the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest court in the state, disregarded existing medical standards in favor of outdated ones when it decided Moore wasn’t mentally disabled. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
Attorneys for 57-year-old Bobby James Moore argue the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest court in the state, disregarded existing medical standards in favor of outdated ones when it decided Moore wasn’t mentally disabled. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
From the Jimeno decision:The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
In response James Eadie QC states that withdrawal need not be a joint effort but, if it must be, Parliament’s decision to pass the European Union Referendum Act 2015 is sufficient cooperation with the Government. 14.33: James Eadie QC states “The Government has the constitutional responsibility and ability… to make and ratify treaties. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
She faces a £190,000 bill after the failed libel action in which James successfully counter-sued. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
General James Mattis for Secretary of Defense. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:18 am
The provision was declared unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
The case is styled Secretary of State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:11 am
Canada is not the United States. [read post]
