Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The thought was this:Amongst the (many) downsides of living on an Indian reservation is the fact that any major crimes for which you're charged get prosecuted in federal court, which is substantially -- substantially -- tougher than state court. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
Much like Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:05 pm
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 11:17 am
Citing Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:35 am
Morgan Employer Fails to State Stored Communications Act Claims Absent Allegations That Employees Interfered With Company Accounts – Castle Megastore v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:18 am
On the surface, this seems like a favorable judicial draw for the plaintiffs. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
Though not expressly stated in the Order, it seems likely that Judge Rakoff was deferring the issuance of a fully-reasoned order until the Supreme Court’s issuance of its Dukes v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
See Wal-Mart v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:59 am
The post Wedding cakes v. religious beliefs? [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
In a 4-3 decision, in State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
United States v Windsor challenges the denial of federal benefits for gay couples under the Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA].As many as 17 states have filed amicus briefs in opposition to gay marriage. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:08 pm
Last month, in Dorsey v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:05 am
Last month, in Dorsey v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that if a Bill of the UK Parliament were to change the Scottish Parliament’s competence like this, then such a Bill would engage the legislative consent convention. 15.28 Wolffe QC states that he does not consider Scottish Parliament to have any veto on the decision to trigger article 50 but that its view is relevant to the question of legislative consent. 15.26 Wolffe QC’s preliminary comments are over and he is now turning to the specific… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:41 pm
The court’s opinion in Espinoza v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
It does this by applying Jacobson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 6:28 am
However, the state supreme court justices reversed. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 5:16 pm
They were not yet legally married, and the will did not contain a clause stating it was in contemplation of marriage. [read post]
