Search for: "Martin v. Martin"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 6,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
The rationale for the rule is that, due to the special relationship of the utmost trust and confidence between a client and an attorney, the client has the right to discharge the attorney at any time, for any reason, or for no reason, regardless of any particularized retainer agreement, and the client should not be compelled to pay damages for exercising the absolute right to cancel the contract (see Martin v Camp, 219 NY 170, 173-176 [1916]; see also Demov, Morris, Levin &… [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:20 am
Martin v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
In April 2008, I reported that a divided three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit in Thompson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:45 pm
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
” (citing the Supremes’ (the Court, not the girl group) decision in Martin v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:29 am
Martin, 94 Wn.2d 1, 614 P.2d 164 (Washington Supreme Court 1980)). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
Aston Martin, et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:33 pm
Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004), which positively cited Lesar v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:43 am
In Kerry v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
Alexandra Mezulanik, research assistant at UCL IBIL, examines the much anticipated decision in Martin v Kogan of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo | The Intellectual Property Owners Association | Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2) | Book review: Propertizing European Copyright – History, Challenges and Opportunities | GDPR notification | Thursday Thingies | Around the IP Blogs.Never Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and… [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
In Ralph Loyd Martin Revocable Trust v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Hence, ‘[t]he requirement of originality under the [CDPA] is that the work must be an expression of that author's own intellectual creation’ (Banner, para 26).The guidance provided by the CJEU to the determine the sort of creative choices with which copyright is concerned has been regarded as ‘helpful’ by the Court of Appeal (Kogan v Martin, para 45). [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Note that there was an opposite holding in the 5th circuit under Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Batiste v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:25 pm
As prominent nineteenth century Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story explained in Martin v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:25 am
” Armstrong v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 12:03 pm
Elmendorf is Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 12:57 pm
*First picture is courtesy of Martin Husovec (@hutko). [read post]
