Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 4241 - 4260 of 4,575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 7:50 am by Thomas Swartz
  The pure comparative fault standard used in New York is simply based on the faulty assumption that it always must be considered whether someone else was at fault. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 7:50 am by Thomas Swartz
  The pure comparative fault standard used in New York is simply based on the faulty assumption that it always must be considered whether someone else was at fault. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 7:50 am by Thomas Swartz
  The pure comparative fault standard used in New York is simply based on the faulty assumption that it always must be considered whether someone else was at fault. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
:Indeed, one would think that tort law, applied by juries under a negligence or strict-liability standard, is less deserving of preservation. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
All of that was pretty standard stuff - based on R(A) v Lambeth - but a pretty innovative argument was addressed to the CA that previous cases on this point did not take account of the changes introduced in the Homelessness Act 2002. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:28 pm
The Supreme Court's revision of general pleading standards in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
The court held:  Petitioner contends that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005]), which dealt with takings for purposes of economic development, requires a preexisting farmland preservation plan to justify the taking of its property as a public use within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment (see US Const Amend V ["nor shall private property be taken for public use,… [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Consumer protection/fraud class actions have increased a staggering 156% over the same period and now account for approximately 20.8% of all federal class actions–up from 13.9% in 2001.[4] Recent years have seen a boom in the use of federal labor statutes, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, ERISA, and the Fair Labor Standards Act, and in suits brought under federal fraud statutes, particularly the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act… [read post]